6 Comments
User's avatar
Ralph Rosenberg's avatar

Thanks, Bob, I learned from past protests where the follow-up was poor. The 2017 Women's March at our State Capitol attracted a great turnout, with great signs, and representation of broad demographics. However, there was little effort to encourage and support participants, as in Immediate capture of contact Information--Set up multiple sign-up stations--digital, or otherwise..

I don't remember if this could be done in 2017, but it can be done now --text-to-join systems ("Text ENGAGE to 12345")

There were little or no statewide efforts to maintain follow-up meetings while momentum was high. With the Iowa legislature in session, in Feb. 2017,, there would have been many opportunities to engage experienced and new activists. Today, with zoom, there is no excuse for digital or in person follow-up.

I read Matt Russell's column on new leaders. If tomorrow's protest is well organized, with a proper follow-through and follow-up, then new leaders will surface and be promoted.

Expand full comment
Mike's avatar

Heading to Sioux Falls in the morning for Hands Off.

Also looking forward to watching Art Cullen on Ruhle's program at !0 pm.

Expand full comment
Robert Leonard's avatar

Thanks for sharing your wisdom, Ralph.

Expand full comment
Jim Knudsen's avatar

Where was the Democratic Party yesterday? I went to their Facebook page and their web site and there was no mention of these protests. Does the Party have any responsibility for maintaining momentum?

Expand full comment
Ralph Rosenberg's avatar

The Party has a responsibility for speaking out and maintaining momentum. The state party and D elected leaders have a responsibility for holding town halls and forums. D legislative leaders can use their positions to oppose what DC is doing. Protests were promoted by some county party leaders in Iowa.

Expand full comment
Julie Gammack's avatar

Thanks, Ralph.

Expand full comment